Skip to main content

Comparing areas

The purpose of this activity is to support students to attend to area (flat space) when comparing two shapes. In this lesson we look to students to use direct comparison, laying one shape on top of another.

A collection of diverse patterns and styles of flooring.

Tags

  • AudienceKaiako
  • Curriculum Level2
  • Education SectorPrimary
  • Learning AreaMathematics and Statistics
  • Resource LanguageEnglish
  • Resource typeActivity
  • SeriesAcceleration resources (for maths)

About this resource

New Zealand Curriculum: Level 2

Learning Progression Frameworks: Measurement sense, Signpost 2 to Signpost 4

These activities are intended for students who can compare the lengths of objects by direct comparison, that is, by bringing the objects together. They may be able to use an informal unit of length, such as a counter or cube, and count all the units to establish a measure, making statements such as “my book is 12 cubes long.” Students should be able to count on or back, or use early part-whole thinking to find the total of two sets (addition) or the result of removing objects from a set (subtraction).

Ngā rawa kei tēnei rauemi:
    Reviews
    0

    Comparing areas

    Achievement objectives

    GM2-1: Create and use appropriate units and devices to measure length, area, volume and capacity, weight (mass), turn (angle), temperature, and time.

    Required materials

    • Comparing areas CM (print and laminate then cut the flounder out)

    See Materials that come with this resource to download:

    • Comparing areas CM (.pdf)
     | 

    1.

    Introduce the flounder from Comparing areas CM - Fiafia and Fatu. Students may know that the fish is a flounder (called pātiki in Māori). Pātiki are a type of flatfish, so they are very thin and have both eyes on the top of their heads.

    2.

    Ask:

    • Which flounder, Fiafia or Fatu, is the biggest?
    • Allow students to discuss this in pairs before discussing the questions as a class.
    • Can you convince me you are right?
    • Look for students to directly compare the fish by placing one on top of the other. Fiafia is longer than Fatu, so students who confuse length with area will still choose the correct answer.
    Two flounder fish, captioned "Fiafia" and "Fatu", placed on top of each other.

    3.

    • When we compare the size of two pātiki, do we just look at how long they are?

    Raise the possibility that the width of the fish might also be important.

    4.

    Similarly, compare the lengths of the pātiki called Fred and Felicity. These fish are the same length, but clearly Felicity is bigger than Fred.

    Two flounder fish, captioned "Fred" and "Felicity", placed on top of each other.
    • Why is it that these flounder are the same length, but one is bigger than the other?
    • Look for students to explain that the width of the fish must also be considered when comparing them by size. Overlap the fish to show that the lengths are equal, but Felicity is wider than Fred.
    • Summarise that the size of a flounder depends on both how long and how wide the fish is.

    5.

    Compare the other two pairs of fish, Finlay and Fiona, and Pātiki and Hirame (Japanese for founder). Both pairs have differences in the length and width of the fish.

    • Finlay is shorter than Fiona, but she is wider.
    • Pātiki is longer than Hirame but not as wide.

    6.

    Let students discuss how to decide which fish is bigger. Look for a student to suggest that the area must be equal, the same. Another student may suggest that "taking and giving" overlapping parts to make the fish about the same width or length might work.  

    Two pairs of flounder fish overlapping each other: the first pair, named Finlay and Fiona; and the second pair, named Pātiki and Hirame.

    7.

    Provide students with a copy of pages 3-4 of Comparing areas CM, scissors and tape. Initially, you might model completing one of the puzzles for the class or use a guided approach to help students solve one of the puzzles. Consider grouping students strategically to encourage tuakana-teina.

    • These puzzles can be solved in two directions. In the example below, the L shape can be cut up and reformed to make the pentagon (house shape), or the pentagon cut up and reformed to create the L shape.
    Two shapes, an L shape and a pentagon, with arrows in between, pointing in the direction of both shapes.
    • The purpose of the puzzles is to develop students’ understanding of conservation of area (horahanga). Shapes can be reformed into other shapes with the same area, amount of flat space. Often, shapes that look to have different areas but have the same area.

    1.

    Provide students with experiences where the spaces are of similar area and one shape can be modified to make the other shape. For example, a "give and take" approach can be used to show that the shapes in each of the pairs below have the same area.

    Four shapes: a yellow rectangle and a yellow crescent, and a blue triangle and a blue six-sided, arrow-like shape.

    2.

    Have students find two-dimensional shapes in their environment and compare the areas of the shapes.

    The quality of the images on this page may vary depending on the device you are using.