Skip to main content

Decimal recurrence

The purpose of this activity is to engage students in recognising patterns in recurring decimals, and linking the size of those decimals to the division of 100 that produces them.

Four children are playing with two large dice.

Tags

  • AudienceKaiako
  • Curriculum Level5
  • Learning AreaMathematics and Statistics
  • Resource LanguageEnglish
  • Resource typeActivity
  • SeriesRich learning activities

About this resource

This activity assumes the students have experience in the following areas:

  • Applying the properties of whole numbers under multiplication and division.
  • Understanding and applying the place value of decimals in calculations.

The problem is sufficiently open-ended to allow the students freedom of choice in their approach. It may be scaffolded with guidance that leads to a solution, and/or the students might be given the opportunity to solve the problem independently.

The example responses at the end of the resource give an indication of the kind of response to expect from students who approach the problem in particular ways.

Reviews
0

Decimal recurrence

Achievement objectives

NA5-3: Understand operations on fractions, decimals, percentages, and integers.

Required materials

See Materials that come with this resource to download:

  • Decimal recurrence activity (.pdf)

Activity

When 100 is divided by a whole number, sometimes the answers are interesting decimals.

If you calculate 100 ÷ 11, you get this display on a calculator:

A calculator showing the answer of 9.090909091.

The pattern would carry on forever if the calculator screen was big enough. The 1 at the end comes from rounding.

Here are some other decimal patterns that come from dividing 100 by a whole number. What number is 100 divided by to get each pattern?

Decimal patterns on six calculator screens.

What other decimal patterns can you find by dividing 100 by a whole number?

The following prompts illustrate how this activity can be structured around the phases of the mathematics investigation cycle.

Make sense

Introduce the problem. Allow students time to read it and discuss it in pairs or small groups.

  • How are the number patterns in the display created?
  • What missing number do I need to find in each case? (The divisor.)
  • What do I know about multiplication and division for other problems I have solved?
  • Which examples would be the easiest to try first?

Plan approach

Discuss ideas about how to solve the problem. Emphasise that, in the planning phase, you want students to say how they would solve the problem, not to actually solve it.

  • Which examples would be the easiest to try first?
  • How big is the divisor in each case? Make an estimate. How do you make an estimate?
  • Why do the quotients (answers) result in non-terminating decimals?
  • Which strategies should I pursue? (Can I progress from trial and improvement to a more efficient method?)
  • What tools (digital or physical) could help my investigation? (Can I configure the column width in my spreadsheet to get more digits?)

Take action

Allow students time to work through their strategy and find a solution to the problem.

  • Have I shown my workings in a step-by-step way?
  • Have I organised my examples in a way that helps me see patterns?
  • Is there a pattern? If not, is there still something going on in all cases?
  • Can I move beyond specific examples to find an algorithm that works all the time?

Convince yourself and others

Allow students time to check their answers, and then either have them pair share with other groups or ask for volunteers to share their solution with the class.

  • What is the solution to the cases I am given?
  • What other cases did I try?
  • How would I find an unknown divisor if the numbers were whole numbers? Would that strategy work with decimals as well?
  • Have I considered all possible cases to come up with an algorithm that always works?
  • Which representations (text, table, graph, numbers, diagram, equations) will be easy to understand and will help me justify my generalisation?

Examples of work

 | 

The student uses trial and error approaches to find the missing divisor. For example:

100 ÷ ? = 2.272727273

I tried around 50 first.

100 ÷ 49 = 2.040816327

100 ÷ 40 = 2.5

100 ÷ 43 = 2.325581395 (close)

100 ÷ 44 = 2.272727273 (correct)

The student applies the properties of multiplication and division, particularly the inverse property, to find the missing divisor and creates other patterns by systematically trialling divisors. For example:

100 ÷ ? = 1.219512195

That means:

100 ÷ 1.219512195 = ?

I got 82.00000303 so

100 ÷ 82 = 1219512195

Conceptually focused students are likely to use their understanding of divisibility to choose appropriate divisors in their search for patterns. For example:

I think multiples of 3 and 7 are good choices. They don't go into 100 equally, so they might make nice patterns.

100 ÷ 49 = 2.040816327 (no)

100 ÷ 14 = 7.142857143 (that works)

100 ÷ 33 = 3.03030303 (correct)

100 ÷ 27 = 3.703703704 (correct)

If students have access to computer spreadsheets, they can find all the quotients easily and look for recurring patterns. Students might notice that multiples of four and five mostly give terminating decimals while multiples of three, seven, and eleven usually give recurring patterns. They may recognise that recurring decimals occur when any prime factors of the divisor are not factors of 100. For example, 15 = 3 x 5 (3 is not a factor of 100) and 14 = 2 x 7 (7 is not a factor of 100).

The quality of the images on this page may vary depending on the device you are using.