Skip to main content

My town

This is a level 3 statistics activity from the Figure It Out series. A PDF of the student activity is included.

<img src="/images/decorative.jpg" alt"" />

Tags

  • AudienceKaiako
  • Learning AreaMathematics and Statistics
  • Resource LanguageEnglish
  • Resource typeActivity
  • SeriesFigure It Out

About this resource

Figure It Out is a series of 80 books published between 1999 and 2009 to support teaching and learning in New Zealand classrooms.

This resource provides the teachers’ notes and answers for one activity from the Figure It Out series. A printable PDF of the student activity can be downloaded from the materials that come with this resource.

Specific learning outcomes:

  • Sort the data using a spreadsheet.
  • Draw conclusions from the data.
  • Compare conclusions with those made by classmates.
Reviews
0

My town

Achievement objectives

S3-2: Evaluate the effectiveness of different displays in representing the findings of a statistical investigation or probability activity undertaken by others.

Description of mathematics

This diagram shows the areas of statistics involved in this activity.

Investigation

Literacy

Probability

P

P

D

A

C

 

The bottom half of the diagram represents the 5 stages of the statistics investigation cycle, PPDAC (problem, plan, data, analysis, conclusion).

Required materials

  • Figure It Out, Levels 23, Statistics Revised Edition, "My town", pages 12–13
  • a computer spreadsheet program
  • classmates

See Materials that come with this resource to download:

  • My town activity (.pdf)

Activity

 | 

This self-contained activity revolves around the data depicted in the illustration on page 12 of the students’ book. Students process and explore it in different ways as they determine the answers to questions and the validity of statements.

As a first task, the students enter the data into a spreadsheet. This is to get it into a form that can be easily sorted and re-sorted in whatever order is most helpful for the purpose. For example, to answer Keni’s second “I wonder” question, it is helpful to sort the data firstly by the number of people and secondly by the number of bedrooms, using the sort function:

An application sorting data from ascending and descending.

The answers show a table that has been sorted in this way. The grey bands group the lines according to household size.

An alternative method of sorting the data is to make a set of square data cards, one for each house, as in the example. Just as in the spreadsheet, the data cards can first be sorted by one variable (for example, the number of people) and then by a second. They can easily be re-sorted to answer other queries.

A square, separated into quarters, each quarter captioned with one of the following: 3 bedrooms, 2 cars, 8 people, 1 TV's.

Note that the answer to Keni’s first “I wonder” question is very straightforward. This is not true of his second question, where the answer can be either yes or no, depending on how the question is interpreted. This invites mathematical disputation.

The statements in question 3 are designed to get the students to explore the database in some detail, to decide what data supports or refutes each statement, and to think about the personal circumstances that the statistics purport to represent.

Question 4 asks about generalising from the data. This challenges the students to think about whether Keni’s data is likely to be representative of the whole town. If they think about their own community, town, or city, they are likely to realise that it is made up of different areas, each with its own distinct focus and character. They will also realise that amenities are spread around and that, just because there isn’t (for example) a movie theatre in their immediate neighbourhood, this doesn’t mean there isn’t one on the other side of town.

This entire activity is best done in pairs or small groups. In this way, students are able to have unsubstantiated statements challenged and learn to use data as the basis of the argument. The students could be challenged to think of further “I wonder” questions or further statements and swap these with other students to answer, or support or refute using Keni’s data.

1.

House

People

TVs

Cars

Bedrooms

A

2

1

2

2

B

3

2

1

2

C

6

1

2

4

D

3

1

2

3

E

4

1

2

3

F

7

2

3

4

G

4

1

4

2

H

8

 2

1

3

I

5

1

3

4

J

2

1

1

3

K

4

1

2

3

L

1

1

1

3

M

8

1

2

3

N

5

2

2

4

O

7

1

2

3

P

3

2

1

3

Q

2

1

2

2

R

1

1

1

1

S

7

1

1

3

T

2

1

2

1

In the spreadsheet below, the data has been sorted by the number of people and bedrooms using the sort function. The bands of shading separate the data by number of people.

House

People

Bedrooms

TVs

Cars

R

1

1

1

1

L

1

3

1

1

T

2

1

1

2

A

2

2

1

2

Q

2

2

1

2

J

2

3

1

1

B

3

2

2

1

P

3

3

2

1

D

3

3

1

2

G

4

2

1

4

E

4

3

1

2

K

4

3

1

2

N

5

4

2

2

I

5

4

1

3

C

6

4

1

2

S

7

3

1

1

O

7

3

1

2

F

7

4

2

3

H

8

3

2

1

M

8

3

1

2

2.

a.–b. The conclusion to Keni’s first question should be “no”. There are only 5 houses that have more than 1 TV (B, F, H, N, and P). Of these, only 2 (less than half) have more than 1 car (F and N). Conclusions for Keni’s second question will vary:

  • If we assume that the houses with the most bedrooms are the “biggest” houses, then the biggest houses on Keni’s map are the ones with 4 bedrooms. These houses are all occupied by between 5 and 7 people. Families of this size are definitely among the “biggest”.
  • The two biggest families actually have 8 people in them, and both of these families are in 3-bedroom houses (I and N). By this measure, it is not true to say that “the biggest families live in the biggest houses”.
  • If we define “biggest families” to be those with 5 or more people in them, half of these families live in 3-bedroom houses and half live in 4-bedroom houses.

3.

a.

  • Dave: True. 14 out of the 20 houses have 3 or 4 bedrooms. Silei: Not true. There are two 4-bedroom houses (I and N) that have only 5 people living in them.
  • Henare: There is no way to be sure, but this statement is very unlikely to be true. While there are only 2 houses that have more bedrooms than people (J and L), there are other houses where 2 adults or 2 children probably share a bedroom, leaving 1 bedroom spare.
  • Matt: True. There are only 2 houses with 1 bedroom (R and T); the first has 1 person in it, and the second has 2.
  • Meng: Not true. Only 6 of the 20 houses (A, G, L, Q, R, and T) have 1 car per person. This is not “nearly half”.
  • Fleur: True. 4 houses (H, M, O, and S) have 7 or 8 people living in them but only 3 bedrooms.

4.

Keni should not try and make generalisations about the homes and community facilities (shops, libraries, churches, halls, and so on) in Rangipai as a whole based on his data. The town has about 200 homes, and his data concerns only the 20 homes in his neighbourhood. We have no idea if, for example, there is a medical clinic in another part of town or a library, hotel, or saleyard. We don’t know what shopping is available locally or whether the better-off homes are near Keni or in another part of the town. We don’t know if the nearest big town is 10 or 100 km away.

"My town" can be used to develop these key competencies:

  • thinking
  • using language, symbols, and texts.

The quality of the images on this page may vary depending on the device you are using.